Are these the checks real editors use?

They are the checks that can be written down. Editorial judgement also includes market knowledge and taste, which cannot be — and we say so rather than pretending the list is complete.

Which rubric should I start with?

The opening chapter for your genre. It is where the most readers are lost and where the highest proportion of fixable problems sit.

What if my chapter fails most of the checks?

Then it is early, which is what first drafts are. Fix the load-bearing failures first — the rubric marks which those are — and ignore the rest for now.

Do these apply to non-fiction?

The non-fiction rubrics do. Fiction rubrics applied to a business book will give you confident, wrong advice, which is why they are separated by genre.

Can I use these on someone else's manuscript?

Yes, and they make critique-group feedback dramatically more useful — a scored rubric is specific where 'I liked it' is not.

Editorial judgement looks like intuition and mostly is not. It is a set of specific, repeatable checks applied in order. These are those checks, written out by genre and by element, as scorecards you can actually run on your own chapter.

Hub

The checks an editor actually makes

Free. No card. Private.

Score your opening chapter

Send your first chapter and we'll email back the scorecard filled in — every check, passed or failed, with the fix for each. Free.

Or see how it works first

Why the checks are worth seeing

Editorial feedback often arrives as a judgement — the opening isn't working — and an author cannot act on a judgement. They can act on the reader doesn't know what the character wants until page nine, and there is no question on page one that they need answered.

So each rubric breaks an element into its component checks. Each check has a question, what passing looks like, what failing looks like, and what to do about it.

Run one on your own chapter and you will usually find two or three failures you already half-knew about. That is the point: they are made specific enough to fix.

Genre changes the checks, not just the tone

An opening chapter in a thriller and an opening chapter in a memoir are doing different jobs, and the checks differ accordingly.

A thriller opening is checked for whether a threat is present and legible within two pages. A memoir opening is checked for whether the reader knows why this story is being told now. A business-book opening is checked for whether the reader's problem appears before the author's credentials.

Applying the wrong rubric produces confident, wrong advice — which is a fair description of a great deal of writing advice on the internet.

What the scores mean

Each rubric ends with bands rather than a single number, because a percentage on a chapter would be false precision.

The bands say what a score means in practice: whether this chapter is ready for readers, ready for an editor, or needs another pass first. A chapter scoring in the lowest band is not bad; it is early.

And the checks are not weighted equally in real life. A stable point of view matters more than a varied sentence length. The rubric says which are load-bearing.

Running these on a whole book

Your Book Pro is a British book-writing platform. You bring a book — an idea, a folder of notes, half a draft, or a finished manuscript written somewhere else — and it gives you the editorial process a publisher would run: a plan, structured feedback, a simulated beta read, a line edit, a proofread, a cover, a blurb and a print-ready file. You can type it, upload it or speak it. The tools sit in one place and work on the same manuscript, so the feedback compounds instead of arriving as twelve disconnected opinions.

Running a rubric on one chapter by hand is useful and takes half an hour. Running it across ninety thousand words is the job Detailed Editorial Feedback does — the same checks, applied to the whole manuscript at once, reported as a diagnosis of where and why. It costs 600 credits, inside the 1,000 welcome credits every account starts with.

Ask the Editor answers the single specific question while you work — is this opening doing its job? — and the Editing Suite is where the fixing happens, in order, on the same manuscript.

What a human developmental editor adds on top: market judgement. Whether this kind of opening is being acquired this year, and what an agent's reader will do with page one. The checks are transferable; that judgement is not, and it is worth buying if the book is going to agents.

Run a whole-book review

Ask the Editor a question

Email me the scorecard

Questions people ask

Are these the checks real editors use?: They are the checks that can be written down. Editorial judgement also includes market knowledge and taste, which cannot be — and we say so rather than pretending the list is complete.
Which rubric should I start with?: The opening chapter for your genre. It is where the most readers are lost and where the highest proportion of fixable problems sit.
What if my chapter fails most of the checks?: Then it is early, which is what first drafts are. Fix the load-bearing failures first — the rubric marks which those are — and ignore the rest for now.
Do these apply to non-fiction?: The non-fiction rubrics do. Fiction rubrics applied to a business book will give you confident, wrong advice, which is why they are separated by genre.
Can I use these on someone else's manuscript?: Yes, and they make critique-group feedback dramatically more useful — a scored rubric is specific where 'I liked it' is not.