A critique is a reader's structured response to a portion of your work — usually three chapters — telling you whether it holds. An assessment covers the whole book. A beta read is a reader's experience rather than a professional's judgement. An edit changes the text. Four different questions, four different prices.

Critique, assessment, beta read or edit — which do you need?

Four kinds of feedback, four different questions

Match the question you actually have. Buying the wrong one is why so many authors say feedback wasn't useful.

The question it answersScopeCost
CritiqueDoes this opening work? Should I keep going?3 chapters, usually£85–£215
First read / initial feedbackWhat have I actually got here?Whole draft, impressionistic£250–£600
Beta readHow does a reader experience this?Whole draft, reader's eye£0–£200 per reader
AssessmentDoes the book work, and what are the real problems?Whole draft, diagnostic£400–£900
Developmental editHow do I fix it, chapter by chapter?Whole draft, prescriptive£1,500–£4,800
Free. No card. Private.

An honest first read of your opening

Send your first three chapters and we'll email back what they're actually doing: what the opening promises, where the voice is strongest, and whether a reader would turn to chapter four. Free.

By signing up, you agree to receive useful writing tips and occasional Your Book Pro offers by email. You can unsubscribe at any time. We will never sell your details or share them with third parties for their own marketing.

We'll email it, then a short series on finishing and publishing a book. Unsubscribe in one click, any time.

Or see how it works first

What a critique is for

A critique answers the question authors most want answered and least want to ask: is this worth continuing?

It is usually bought on the first three chapters, because that is where an agent, a browsing reader and a sample-reader all decide. If the opening does not hold, nothing further down the book gets read, so it is also the highest-leverage 3,000 words you own.

A good critique tells you what the opening is promising, whether the voice is consistent, whether the premise is clear by the end of chapter one, and whether a reader would turn to chapter four.

Why the first honest read is so hard to get

Everyone close to you is compromised. Family are kind. Friends are kind and also worried about the friendship. Writing groups can be excellent, and are sometimes a mutual encouragement society with a rota.

The result is that many authors reach draft four having never once been told the truth about draft one — and then pay £2,000 to hear it from an editor, having spent three years going the wrong way.

The first honest read is worth buying early, cheaply, and repeatedly. It is not the last word; it is the thing that stops you compounding.

How to ask for feedback so you get the truth

Never ask is it good? — it is unanswerable and it invites reassurance.

Ask instead: where did you stop? What did you think the book was about after chapter one? Which sentence made you decide what kind of book this was? What would make you not buy this?

And say, explicitly and more than once, that you want the problems. People need permission twice before they believe it, and once more before they'll write it down.

How to receive it

Say thank you. Do not explain. Do not clarify what you meant — the fact that it needed clarifying is the note.

Then wait a week before deciding anything. The first reaction to hard feedback is not information; it is weather.

And separate the report from the person. A critique that says the opening does not work is not a statement about whether you can write. It is a statement about 3,000 specific words, which you can change on Tuesday.

What Your Book Pro does here

Your Book Pro is a British book-writing platform. You bring a book — an idea, a folder of notes, half a draft, or a finished manuscript written somewhere else — and it gives you the editorial process a publisher would run: a plan, structured feedback, a simulated beta read, a line edit, a proofread, a cover, a blurb and a print-ready file. You can type it, upload it or speak it. The tools sit in one place and work on the same manuscript, so the feedback compounds instead of arriving as twelve disconnected opinions.

Initial Feedback is the first honest read. It tells you what you actually have — what the material is doing, where the voice is strongest, what the opening promises and whether the draft keeps it — without the social pressure that makes human first readers so unreliable.

It is deliberately the first rung. Detailed Editorial Feedback is the whole-book diagnosis; Beta Reader is the reader's-eye view; the Editing Suite is where the fixing happens. They work on the same manuscript, so each one knows what the last found.

What a human critique adds, and we say this on the tool page too: an experienced editor reading your opening is also reading the market — whether this kind of opening is being acquired, what an agent's reader will do with page one. For £85–£215 on three chapters, that is a reasonable thing to buy once you have a draft worth showing.

Get a first read

Upload a manuscript written anywhere

Email me the read

Questions people ask

How much does a manuscript critique cost?
£85–£215 for three chapters and a synopsis; £250–£600 for a full first read of a complete manuscript.
Is a critique the same as a beta read?
No. A critique is a professional's judgement on whether the writing works; a beta read is a reader's experience of reading it. Both are useful and they answer different questions.
When should I get my first feedback?
Earlier than most people do — on a complete first draft, or on three chapters if you are unsure whether the approach is working at all. Waiting until draft four means three drafts spent going the wrong way.
Should I get feedback on a partial draft?
On the opening, yes, and it is often the best money you spend. On a random middle section, rarely — it cannot be judged without context.
What if the feedback contradicts my beta readers?
Look for what they agree on. Readers are reliable about their experience and unreliable about causes; editors are the reverse.